Understanding the Transcription Factor Mediated Regulatory Mechanism Towards Abiotic Stress Response in Cereal Crops

Open Access
Download PDF
AgroEnvironmental Sustainability
Tuward J. Dweh , Salma Kayastha , Manaswini Mahapatra , Jyoti Prakash Sahoo

Abstract

Cereal crops are critical to global food security and are valued for their adaptability and nutritional value. However, they are increasingly threatened by abiotic stresses such as water scarcity, high soil salinity, severe climatic conditions, and nutrient deficiencies. This review focuses on the central role of transcription factors (TFs) in the response of cereal crops to these environmental challenges. TFs, such as the DREB family, the bZIP family, and the WRKY family, emerge as central players in this intricate regulatory network. They initiate or inhibit the activation of stress-responsive genes by binding to specific cis-regulatory elements located in gene promoters and enhance the resilience of cereal crops to various abiotic stresses. For example, DREB1/CBF TFs alleviate cold stress, NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2 (NAC) factors combat salinity stress, and WRKY TFs modulate responses to drought, salinity, and cold stress by initiating vital physiological processes, including osmotic regulation, antioxidant defense, and ion homeostasis, ultimately promoting stress tolerance. Genetic engineering strategies that overexpress these stress-responsive genes and TFs hold great promise for enhancing crop resilience and productivity in the face of climate change. In addition, this review also emphasizes the potential of epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, to fine-tune the control of genes that respond to abiotic stresses. These findings benefit agriculture by addressing global food security challenges.

Keywords

abiotic stress tolerance cereal crops gene regulation transcription factors

References

  1. Akhtar, M., Jaiswal, A., Taj, G., Jaiswal, J. P., Qureshi, M. I., & Singh, N. K. (2012). DREB1/CBF transcription factors: their structure, function and role in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Journal of Genetics, 91(3), 385-395. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alamholo, M., & Tarinejad, A. (2023). Molecular mechanism of drought stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) via a combined analysis of the transcriptome data. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 59(2), 76-94. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali, B., Wang, X., Saleem, M. H., Sumaira, Hafeez, A., Afridi, M. S., & Ali, S. (2022). PGPR-mediated salt tolerance in maize by modulating plant physiology, antioxidant defense, compatible solutes accumulation and bio-surfactant producing genes. Plants, 11(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030345 [Google Scholar]
  4. Annum, N., Ahmed, M., Imtiaz, K., Mansoor, S., Tester, M., & Saeed, N. A. (2022). 32Pi labeled transgenic wheat shows the accumulation of phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate and phosphatidic acid under heat and osmotic stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 881188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.881188 [Google Scholar]
  5. Banerjee, A., & Roychoudhury, A. (2022). Molecular Genetic Studies and Breeding and Genomics-Based Approaches to Develop Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Sorghum. In Omics Approach to Manage Abiotic Stress in Cereals (pp. 465-477). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0140-9_18 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bodinga, N. M., Suleiman, I., Malami, I., & Baraya, A. S. (2023). Role of NAC Gene Transcription Factors in the Regulation of Abiotic Stress Responses in Cereal Crops. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, 11(2), 387-393. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gunguniya, D. F., Kumar, S., Patel, M. P., Sakure, A. A., Patel, R., Kumar, D., & Khandelwal, V. (2023). Morpho-biochemical characterization and molecular marker based genetic diversity of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.). PeerJ, 11, e15403. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15403 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu, H., & Xiong, L. (2014). Genetic Engineering and Breeding of Drought-Resistant Crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65(1), 715-741. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nazir, F., Kumari, S., Mahajan, M., & Khan, M. I. R. (2023). An explicit story of plant abiotic stress resilience: Overtone of selenium, plant hormones and other signaling molecules. Plant and Soil, 486(1-2), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05826-2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ndlovu, E., Van Staden, J., & Maphosa, M. (2021). Morpho-physiological effects of moisture, heat and combined stresses on Sorghum bicolor [Moench (L.)] and its acclimation mechanisms. Plant Stress, 2, 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2021.100018 [Google Scholar]
  11. Numan, M., Serba, D. D., & Ligaba-Osena, A. (2021). Alternative strategies for multi-stress tolerance and yield improvement in millets. Genes, 12(5), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050739 [Google Scholar]
  12. Radha, B., Sunitha, N. C., Sah, R. P., TP, M. A., Krishna, G. K., Umesh, D. K., & Siddique, K. H. (2023). Physiological and molecular implications of multiple abiotic stresses on yield and quality of rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 996514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.996514 [Google Scholar]
  13. Sahoo, J. P., Behera, L., Sharma, S. S., Praveena, J., Nayak, S. K., & Samal, K. C. (2020). Omics Studies and Systems Biology Perspective towards Abiotic Stress Response in Plants. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11(12), 2172-2194. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.1112152 [Google Scholar]
  14. Sahoo, J. P., Sharma, V., Verma, R. K., Chetia, S. K., Baruah, A. R., Modi, M. K., & Yadav, V. K. (2019). Linkage analysis for drought tolerance in kharif rice of Assam using microsatellite markers. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 18(2), 371-375. [Google Scholar]
  15. Salika, R., & Riffat, J. (2021). Abiotic stress responses in maize: a review. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 43(9), 130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-021-03296-0 [Google Scholar]
  16. Samal, K. C., Sahoo, J. P., Behera, L., & Dash, T. (2021). Understanding the BLAST (Basic local alignment search tool) Program and a step-by-step guide for its use in life science research. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 36(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.18805/BKAP283 [Google Scholar]
  17. Schindfessel, C., Drozdowska, Z., De Mooij, L., & Geelen, D. (2021). Loss of obligate crossovers, defective cytokinesis and male sterility in barley caused by short-term heat stress. Plant Reproduction, 34(3), 243-253. [Google Scholar]
  18. Solis, C. A., Yong, M. T., Zhou, M., Venkataraman, G., Shabala, L., Holford, P., & Chen, Z. H. (2022). Evolutionary significance of NHX family and NHX1 in salinity stress adaptation in the genus oryza. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(4), 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042092 [Google Scholar]
  19. Soni, S., Kumar, A., Sehrawat, N., Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Lata, C., & Mann, A. (2021). Effect of saline irrigation on plant water traits, photosynthesis and ionic balance in durum wheat genotypes. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(4), 2510-2517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.052 [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, C., Ye, D., Li, Y., Hu, P., Xu, R., & Wang, X. (2023). Genome-wide identification and bioinformatics analysis of the WRKY transcription factors and screening of candidate genes for anthocyanin biosynthesis in azalea (Rhododendron simsii). Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1172321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1172321 [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, M. X., Bai, R., Nan, M., Ren, W., Wang, C. M., Shabala, S., & Zhang, J. L. (2022). Evaluation of salt tolerance of oat cultivars and the mechanism of adaptation to salinity. Journal of Plant Physiology, 273, 153708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153708 [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, X., Liu, W., Lv, Y., Li, T., Tang, J., Yang, X., & Zhou, H. (2022). Effects of drought stress during critical periods on the photosynthetic characteristics and production performance of Naked oat (Avena nuda L.). Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15322-3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, Z., Dong, J., Ji, C., Wu, Y., & Messing, J. (2019). NAC-type transcription factors regulate accumulation of starch and protein in maize seeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(23), 11223-11228. [Google Scholar]
  24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904995116 [Google Scholar]

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.