Impact of Packaging Materials on Banana Shelf Life and Quality in Subtropical Nepal

Open Access
Download PDF
AgroEnvironmental Sustainability
Bigyan Puri , Pawan Chapagaee , Sushil Shrestha , Bhagirathi Namjali Magar , Bhaskar Gautam

Abstract

Banana is a highly perishable crop susceptible to significant postharvest losses, particularly during handling and transportation throughout the supply chain. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different packaging materials—polythene bags, cardboard boxes, banana leaves, rice straw, and no packaging (control)—on the shelf life and quality of bananas in subtropical conditions. A completely randomized design (CRD) was employed with five postharvest treatments and four replicates. Major quality parameters assessed over a 16-day storage period included total soluble solids (TSS), pulp firmness, pH, fruit volume, pulp-to-peel ratio, and fruit weight. The results revealed that bananas packaged in polythene bags exhibited the highest fruit volume (81.25 cm3) and the greatest pulp firmness (0.38 kg/cm2), indicating better texture retention. The highest pH value (6.64) was recorded for bananas packed in cardboard, suggesting slower ripening. The control group (no packaging) exhibited the highest TSS, reflecting faster ripening and potential deterioration. Polythene packaging proved most effective in preserving the initial fruit weight and reducing moisture loss during storage. Both polythene and cardboard packaging significantly enhanced the shelf life and maintained the quality attributes of bananas compared to other treatments. The findings suggest that appropriate packaging materials, particularly polythene and cardboard, play a crucial role in minimizing postharvest losses and extending the shelf life of bananas in subtropical environments. Adopting these packaging methods could improve fruit quality during storage and transportation, thereby supporting better market value and reducing economic losses.

Keywords

packaging materials postharvest losses shelf life storage period

References

  1. Abdisa, Abraham, B. M., Saleh, B. K., & Zelelew, D. Z. (2022). Effect of Post-Harvest Handling and Ripening Methods on Quality and Shelf-Life of Banana. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.132011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Albertini, M.-V., Carcouet, E., Pailly, O., Gambotti, C., Luro, F., & Berti, L. (2006). Changes in Organic Acids and Sugars during Early Stages of Development of Acidic and Acidless Citrus Fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54(21), 8335–8339. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061648j [Google Scholar]
  3. Alina Marc, R., Carmen Mureșan, C., Pop, A., Smaranda Marțiș, G., Elena Mureșan, A., Narcisa Postolache, A., Nicoleta Rațu, R. (2024). An Overview of Ripening Processes. In: New Discoveries in the Ripening Processes. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.114015 [Google Scholar]
  4. Azene, M., Workneh, T. S., & Woldetsadik, K. (2014). Effect of packaging materials and storage environment on postharvest quality of papaya fruit. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(6), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0607-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhattarai, D. R. (2018). Postharvest horticulture in Nepal. Horticulture International Journal, 2(6), https://doi.org/10.15406/hij.2018.02.00096 [Google Scholar]
  6. Budhathoki, P., Pandey, S. kumar, & Magar, P. D. (2022). Review on post-harvest handling of fruits and vegetables to minimize loss. Food and Agri Economics Review, 2(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.26480/faer.01.2022.37.40 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chhetri, B. P., & Ghimire, S. (2023). Postharvest treatment of different concentrations of gibberellic acid on the physicochemical characteristics and shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Malda). International Journal of Chemical Studies, 11(3), 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Valero, D., & Serrano, M. (2013). Growth and ripening stage at harvest modulates postharvest quality and bioactive compounds with antioxidant activity. Stewart Postharvest Review, 9(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2212/spr.2013.3.7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Devkota, A. R., Dhakal, D. D., Gautam, D. M., & Dutta, J. P. (2014). Assessment of Fruit and Vegetable Losses at Major Wholesale Markets in Nepal. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 2(4), 559–562. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v2i4.11551 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhakal, M., Pandey, S., Bhattarai, S., Ghimire, D., & Subedi, S. (2022). Response of Post-Harvest Behavior of Pineapple (Ananas comosus var. Giant Kew) Fruits at Different Storage Conditions. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, 21(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3126/njst.v21i2.62355 [Google Scholar]
  11. Etefa, O. F., Forsido, S. F., & Kebede, M. T. (2022). Postharvest Loss, Causes, and Handling Practices of Fruits and Vegetables in Ethiopia: Scoping Review. Journal of Horticultural Research, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2022-0002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fahrasmane, L., Parfait, B., & Aurore, G. (2014). Bananas, a Source of Compounds with Health Properties. Acta Horticulturae, 1040, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1040.9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghimire, B., C. Dhakal, S., Marahatta, S., Kafle, N., C. Bastakoti, R., & Sharma, S. (2023). Production Potential of Banana in Nepal: Growth Trend and a Comparative Analysis. Food & Agribusiness Management, 4(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.26480/fabm.01.2023.19.24 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gidado, M. J., Gunny, A. A. N., Gopinath, S. C. B., Ali, A., Wongs-Aree, C., & Salleh, N. H. M. (2024). Challenges of postharvest water loss in fruits: Mechanisms, influencing factors, and effective control strategies – A comprehensive review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 17, 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101249 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hailu, M., Seyoum Workneh, T., & Belew, D. (2014). Effect of packaging materials on shelf life and quality of banana cultivars (Musa spp.). Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(11), 2947–2963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0826-5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hakim K A. (2013). Effect of postpost-harvest treatments on physiochemical characters during storage of two banana (Musa spp. L.) cv. Sabri and Amritasagar. International Journal of Biosciences, 3(4), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.4.168-179 [Google Scholar]
  17. Krishnakumar, T., & Thirupathi, V. (2014). Shelf life extension of ethylene treated bananas at different storage temperature with the ethylene action inhibitor, 1-methylcyclopropene. Trends in Biosciences, 22(22), 3673–3679. [Google Scholar]
  18. Maduwanthi, S. D. T., & Marapana, R. A. U. J. (2019). Induced Ripening Agents and Their Effect on Fruit Quality of Banana. International Journal of Food Science, 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2520179 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mahajan, P. V., Caleb, O. J., Singh, Z., Watkins, C. B., & Geyer, M. (2014). Postharvest treatments of fresh produce. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2017), 20130309. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0309 [Google Scholar]
  20. Maibam, P. S., Riram, K., Kumari, K., & Srikanth, P. (2024a). To study and analyse the different packaging materials on shelf-life study of banana (Musa paradisiaca var. Robusta): A Review. BIO Web of Conferences, 110. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202411002003 [Google Scholar]
  21. MoALD. (2022). Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development. Satistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture. Available online: https://www.moald.gov.np/publication/ (accessed on 10 January 2025). [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohd Zaini, H., Roslan, J., Saallah, S., Munsu, E., Sulaiman, N. S., & Pindi, W. (2022). Banana peels as a bioactive ingredient and its potential application in the food industry. Journal of Functional Foods, 92, 105054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2022.105054 [Google Scholar]
  23. Phimolsiripol, Y., & Suppakul, P. (2016). Techniques in Shelf-Life Evaluation of Food Products. In Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier. pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.03293-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pradhan, A., Poonam, Sikarwar, R. S., & Kushwah, A. (2023). Evaluate the Effect of Different Packaging Materials on the Shelf Life and Quality of Banana Fruit. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(11), 2225–2232. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113385 [Google Scholar]
  25. Raj Bist, D., Khatri, L., Kunwar, A., Dhami, R., & Raj Joshi, G. (2024). Optimizing post-harvest handling practices to reduce losses and enhance quality of fruits and vegetables. Food and Agri Economics Review, 4(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.26480/faer.02.2024.54.58 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sah, A., Ghimire, A., & Sah, M. (2023). Effect of Different Postharvest Treatment on Shelf Life of Banana (Musa paradisiaca cv. Malbhog). Malaysian Journal of Halal Research, 6(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.26480/mjhr.02.2023.45.49 [Google Scholar]
  27. Umeohia, U. E., & Olapade, A. A. (2024). Physiological Processes Affecting Postharvest Quality of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. Asian Food Science Journal, 23(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9734/afsj/2024/v23i4706 [Google Scholar]
  28. Yogi, L. N., Adhikari, S. P., Bohara, K., & Thapa, D. (2023). Comparative analysis of different packaging materials on the postharvest performance of banana fruits. International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science, 5(2), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.33545/26631067.2023.v5.i2a.169 [Google Scholar]
  29. Zerga, K., & Tsegaye, B. (2020). Effect of Different Packaging Material on Shelf Life and Quality of Banana (Musa spp). International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 61, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7176/jaas/61-01 [Google Scholar]

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.